Identification of Stakeholders Essay

IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS 2
Stakeholders
The security policy issue is a major concern facing Congress; this has occurred due to the modern advancement in technology whereby the antagonists may use digital platforms such as social media campaigns to achieve their objectives through various means.
Traditionally, election administrators justify for voter’s eligibility and ensure the free and fair election is carried out. In the modern electoral administration, national authorities set up to respond to security issues that may arise during campaigns or elections (Pol’y, 2016). To achieve this role, several stakeholders are involved in playing in various fields.
The federal role in the campaign and election security ensures domestic political subversion is kept at bay. Since election security policy is rapidly evolving in the modern world, the Senate committee and the Multiple House have practiced investigatory and supervision hearings (N Pedriana, 2017). Congress and United States presidents’ administrators have engaged federal authorities with new roles for helping the state and preventing possible future ripples.
The selected federal statutes modulate the partition of governmental roles for election; two election-specific legislative acts can be crucial for the campaign and election security. Help America Vote Act is the sole national act dedicated to supporting states with the administration of elections. The selected agency stakeholders in the commerce department advise the Electoral Administration Commission on scientific and proficient issues (Robinson, 2019). The defense department stakeholders provide intelligence and cybersecurity services to ensure tracking any foreign threats to the election process. This department works closely with homeland security, supporting the state on cybersecurity issues; it protects the main presidential aspirants.
The department of justice implements criminal law and civil prospects of various electoral statutes. The Federal Bureau of Investigations enquire into election crimes and participate in the intelligence community. Department of state guides federal efforts to deal with foreign disinformation regarding elections (JS Rofe, 2017). It works closely with the department of treasury to administrate countenance for elections interference. The department of treasury can also take part in investigations of forbidden foreign hindrance in the elections.
The Election Assistance Commission administrates most of HAVA finances and supervises a voluntary voting process testing and program certification; it also provides voluntary election administration direction, best exercise, and study.
Federal Election Commission administrates and enacts finance campaign laws, which include disavowal strange-national provisions that could be relevant to election security (Tejada, 2017). The Intelligence Community constitutes many agencies, and it assesses foreign efforts to influence the US elections and campaigns. Election Threat Executive is the major election principal to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI).
The Congress responded to a menace that came out during the 2016 election cycle; since the 2016 elections, it has supplied finances to secure the election system both to states and territorial dominion.
In conclusion, both the state and localities can play a major role in facing both types of threats; they both lead to guarding their election systems. The national government has supplied finances and proficient support to secure the process they utilize to run elections; however, locality and state have primary roles to ensure that their systems are physically and technology-wise secure.
References JS Rofe, M. H. (2017). US Presidential Elections and Foreign Policy: Candidates, Campaigns, and Global Politics from FDR to Bill Clinton. University Press of Kentucky. N Pedriana, R. S. (2017). From legal doctrine to social transformation? Comparing US voting rights, equal employment opportunity, and fair housing legislation. American Journal of Sociology, Pol’y, M. M.-H. (, 2016). De Facto Class Actions: Plaintiff-and Defendant-Oriented Injunctions in Voting Rights, Election Law, and Other Constitutional Cases. HeinOnline. Robinson, W. (2019). A Faustian bargain: US intervention in the Nicaraguan elections and American foreign policy in the post-Cold War era. Routledge. Tejada, D. B. (2017). Election security and economics: It’s all about eveInternational Joint Conference on Electronic Voting.